
Dr. Bill
Jewell '57, Chair of the Building on
Excellence Steering Committee |
By: William R. Jewell, M.D. '57
Like the song, “Where Have All The Flowers Gone,” I lament and
ponder what has become of science in this wonderful country of ours.
The song that we at Blackburn should be singing is “Where has all
the science gone.” Since the F.W. Olin Science Building was opened
in 1957 (and actually before that time) science has been one of the
strongest areas of study at Blackburn. And in this country, science
has been one of our most prized commodities since the genius of
Thomas Jefferson. Ponder for a moment with me why this country has
become what it has. Why do we have the standard of living that we
now all enjoy? Why do we have the best health care anywhere in the
world? How did we manage to put a man on the moon? How did we manage
to win the cold war? The answer to each of these is that we have led
the world in scientific development for the past several decades.
But there are several reason to believe this may not continue to be
the case.
The most serious problem is that our young people are no longer
choosing careers in science like they once did. For example, the
United States now ranks 17th among major nations in the proportion
of those ages 18 and 24 who graduate with a degree in the natural
sciences or engineering. In 1975 we ranked third according to the
National Science Board. Graduate schools are now filling their ranks
of Ph.D. candidates and post doctoral fellows with foreign-born
students in these areas. Although these students are usually very
well qualified and industrious, many of them will return to their
homelands and contribute to the scientific intellectual pool of
their countries, but not directly to ours. But it gets worse. Less
than one-third of eighth grade students successfully passed a
national science exam in the year 2000, which was the last time that
it was given. Fourth and twelfth grade students did worse.
So what is the problem? We simply are not doing a good enough job
of reaching out to students at an early age to “turn them on” to
science. And the principle reason for this is that there is a clear
lack of qualified teachers to teach science at a primary and middle
school level. According to a Department of Education poll, 94% of
parents said that science is important for their child’s success in
a global world, but their children are receiving less than half as
much science teachings as their parents did when they were in
school. A recent poll by the Bayer Corporation found that only six
out of ten primary school teachers felt qualified to teach science
or to even answer students’ questions on science issues. What can we
at Blackburn do to help correct this situation? We need to do
everything we can to make science more attractive for our in-coming
students so that more of them will get “turned on” to science so
that they in turn can go on to further studies in scientific fields
or become primary or secondary level science teachers. This is
exactly why I feel the new science building is so important.
Together as alumni and friends of Blackburn we can do what is
necessary to get the job done. The Olin Science Building has served
us well for nearly 50 years. It is critical that we expand and
renovate to bring our facilities up to a level capable of meeting
the challenge of the future.
We currently are blessed with a very talented and dedicated
science faculty, but they cannot do their job unless we have
adequate facilities. I would like to see us in the next decade
double the number of students each year that graduate from Blackburn
who go on to post graduate education in a science area or go out to
teach science at a primary or secondary level. I am sure that we can
reach this goal. But ensuring continued excellence in our science
programs can only be accomplished by matching the excellence of our
science faculty with new and restored facilities. It is time for all
of us to do everything we can to help with this project.

Copyright ©2008 Blackburn College. All rights reserved.
|